![]() He is an emeritus professor in the History and Philosophy of Science department at the University of. A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'. John Earman is an American philosopher of physics. Holder - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):49-65. Hume on miracles: Bayesian interpretation, multiple testimony, and the existence of God. John Earman is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh. John Earman - 2000 - New York, US: Oxford University Press. By focusing on the need for a resolution to this impasse, Earman sharpens the issues on which a resolution turns. Earman argues that Bayesianism provides the best hope for a comprehensive and unified account of scientific inference, yet the presently available versions of Bayesianisin fail to do justice to several aspects of the testing and confirming of scientific theories and hypotheses. Both Bayesians and anti-Bayesians will find a wealth of new insights on topics ranging from Bayes’s original paper to contemporary formal learning theory.In a paper published posthumously in 1763, the Reverend Thomas Bayes made a seminal contribution to the understanding of "analogical or inductive reasoning." Building on his insights, modem Bayesians have developed an account of scientific inference that has attracted numerous champions as well as numerous detractors. Bayes or Bust? provides the first balanced treatment of the complex set of issues involved in this nagging conundrum in the philosophy of science. There is currently no viable alternative to the Bayesian analysis of scientific inference, yet the available versions of Bayesianism fail to do justice to several aspects of the testing and confirmation of scientific hypotheses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |